I Am Yuppie

January 25, 2009

I like to make fun of yuppies, but occasionally I have to admit to a great big closet yuppie chattering (loudly, on the iphone) inside me. Sometimes this happens when republicans are making fun of liberals and I think, what’s wrong with lattes? Mostly it happens when I’m grocery shopping.

biscottiI remember a few years ago waiting in the check-out line behind a woman a few years older than me. Her toddler, no older than two, was reaching for one of the impulse items. Quite seriously the woman said, “That’s biscotti. BIS-COTT-EY. Can you say biscotti?” It made me giggle at the time, but I guess I can’t make too much fun when I’m the one choosing to shop at a store where there’s biscotti up front instead of Butterfingers.

Today I had another reminder when we stopped to look at a plastic wrapped package of veal brains. You know your grocery store is catering to yuppies when they sell veal brains.

Matt and I made fun of Heinens for a while until we got to the check-out line. Then we got into a discussion with the woman working the register about the benefits of bison meat versus ostrich meat.

I looked at the items in our cart. Organic broccoli, organic garlic, organic eggs, organic milk, organic whole wheat pasta. Ostrich fillets and pesto turkey sausage. I realized, we belong here. Like it or not, we really are yuppies.

I shouldn’t be ashamed of trying to eat healthy, of trying to keep chemicals out of my body. I’m not really. I am occasionally embarrassed though. And why?

I know that Obama’s presidency is supposed to shoo in a new era of cooperation and forgiveness, but every so often I find myself overcome with a wave of anger at the right wing media machine.

foxI know republicans claim that there’s a massive liberal media conspiracy. As an openly leftist liberal myself, I can’t claim objectivity, so even though I think it’s absurd to call the reporters on NPR biased, I’ll admit there might be some liberal bias in some media channels, so long as conservatives will admit the same on their side. And to me there is a huge difference between the supposed liberal bias and the blatent, Fox News b.s.

The “liberal meda” might have spent the last eight years attacking the bush administration (and no, obviously that was a bias and not the result of, I dunno, incompetence) but Fox News has spent the last eight years attacking ME.

How the HELL did they manage to turn energry conservation into something bad, into a sign of elitism? Since when is buying organic a bad thing? How dare they imply that anyone who is health conscious, or environmentally conscious, or socially conscious is a flighty, empty headed LIBERAL, with liberal suddenly carrying approximately all the positive qualities of a pinko-commie-Marxist in the 50s?

It’s not only that, not only the anti-liberal message we’ve been force fed for years. I am furious every time I think of Sarah Palin talking about how the “real America” is in small towns. The clear implication is that if you aren’t a Palin “type,” not a corn farmer, or a fake plummer or a… whatever else it is they do in small towns, you’re not a real American.

So fine. I like fruufy coffee drinks and I buy organic. I threatened to move to Canada when Bush got re-elected. I threatened again if Obama didn’t win, and I kind of meant it. I am a liberal and I can’t stand Sarah Palin. I may well be a yuppie. In spite of all that, I would like to make one thing perfectly clear.

I do not eat veal brains.
brains
*Photos from Flickr users Jhritz and Kerryank. And me.

About Author

Meagan

Meagan is an artist, writer, and whatever else suits her at any given moment. She lives in the Cleveland area with her husband, son and too many cats. Meagan blogs at https://hadesarrow.com/blog and cartoons at http://dragondown.com

7 Replies to “I Am Yuppie”

  1. And just for clarity’s sake, it should be noted that the media didn’t attack Bush for 8 years… they’ve been vociferous enough about it lately, but up through the first months of the Iraq war, the whole of the media seemed to be in “stand by your man” mode with regards to the Presnit… which makes an interesting contrast to the way that Fox is reacting to Obama, doesn’t it?

    Anyway, whatever minor biases some of the media outlets may have toward liberal social issues, when it comes down to economics, there’s no liberal bias to be seen–it’s just not there.

  2. For the most part I don’t think the media attacked him at all, I wouldn’t consider pointing out facts “attacking,” but there’s been eight years talking about this mythic left wing media. And there probably has been some bias some places, I just haven’t heard much of it. However I HAVE seen a backlash creating a fake sense of “balance,” such as giving “equal” hearing to both sides of the global warming debate even when 99% of scientists are on one side.

    Some people might disagree with you about a bias in economics, but I think you’re probably right. From what I’ve heard there’s been plenty of airtime given to every possible opinion. People in Washington also seem to be making a sincere effort to get along even if they don’t agree.

  3. Sorry, “attack” was the wrong word choice–I really meant “hold him accountable” or “call his decisions into question.” I’d say the myth of the liberal media goes back longer than 8 years–at least since the early 90s with the advent of right-wing talk radio we’ve had this myth–which has gradually become accepted wisdom even among centrist voters–of the liberal media.

    I wish I could remember where I saw it, but I remember some years ago seeing a deconstruction of this idea of the “liberal” media, and the basic premise was that while it might be true that rank and file reporters, on the whole, are on the left side of the political spectrum, the people who make the actual decisions at the top tend to be quite conservative, and when push comes to shove in terms of economic issues, the fundamentals of the capitalist system–and particularly in later years the free market system of unfettered, de-regulated business (and now we’re talking since Reagan at least), these things are not questioned and not open to question. I wish I could remember the concrete examples of stories that were pulled or retracted because advertisers–and remember, that’s where the money is for any news, print, televised, or internet–might object.

    [/tirade]

    In any case, you seem to be right about the sincere efforts to reach across party lines, which it appears could only happen when the Republicans became the minority in both congress and the executive.

    JohnSherck blogged..Weekend Food Roundup

  4. As a hardcore liberal turned moderate conservative I have to say that the majority of media outlets are liberal. Fox News has a conservative bent in terms of who their talk show hosts are, but the reporting is fair and balanced. I am someone that used to watch CNN as well as MSNBC and migrated to FOX while I was still a liberal. I don’t believe NPR is liberal, that is garbage. I listen to NPR for about two hours a day (usually in the morning to catch the BBC and maybe an interview with Marty).

    There was a huge bias towards the economy in the media. You can go on youtube and see c-span clips of people getting blasted by Barney Frank for bring up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. There was a NY Times article written while Clinton was still in office warning of this very exact collapse. News outlets (including Fox) have done a poor job of reporting on the facts.

    I also guarantee that if Barack fails to achieve success and screws something up that he will not be attacked the same way Bush was (and I am not a Bush fan). You watch, you watch your own opinion to and see if you are any more forgiving to Obama than you were to Bush. I am certainly going to be as critical as Obama as I have been to any politician.

    btw I linked here through Nate’s lj, i look forward to the discussion. Take care!

    On a final note to John, deregulation was not the issue. Lack of oversight was, and if you look now there is still a major lack of oversight with all the “bail out” money.

  5. That last point is a fair one, Sirithkai, but it seems to me that deregulation and lack of oversight have been part and parcel of the same bill of goods: “we have to have a free market” and “everything’s better in the private sector” translates to “leave us the hell alone to do whatever we want.” And then it’s “profit, profit ueber alles.”

    It will be interesting to see how the media ultimately treats Obama. To be fair here, Bush got a pretty free pass from all sides of the mainstream media from 9/11 up well into the invasion of Iraq–as someone who frequently disagreed and mistrusted Bush even earlier in the game, I remember being frequently frustrated by the kid gloves with which Bush was treated for the first couple years. At the same time, he’s probably gotten it a bit worse than he deserved by the end.

    Each of these Presidents has had big problems to face early in their Presidencies, though arguably Obama should be more prepared for them, since his problems are more visible now than Bush’s were when he went in. I suspect that Obama will ultimately have a smaller margin of error, however.

    JohnSherck blogged..Weekend Food Roundup

  6. I agree and your point exposes that both democrats and republicans have their heads up their asses because oversight is still something not being called for. Bush did get a pass in a lot of respects in the beginning, and he certainly deserved alot of the criticism that was waged against him by the media at the end. I just got upset that no matter what Bush did it was considered “evil”. I am not a fan of Bush, but i can atleast acknowledge some of the good things (like the AIDS relief in Arica). I have alot of hope for Obama and my criticism is not to tear him down, but to learn more and get people to take a deeper look.

  7. Maybe the larger problem with the media is not so much a bias as it is stupidity. I don’t mean a lack of intelligence in the watchers or the reporters, I mean that these 24 hour news networks are trying so hard to get watchers, and have so much time on their hands, that what we end up with is a whole bunch of crap. I used to consider CNN a decent neutral outlet, and I still think it’s neutral, I just don’t think it’s decent. At least with NPR I always feel like I’m learning something, and I have a reasonable amount of confidence that things are really happening the way they say they’re happening.

    I don’t think Bush is evil, but I think he’s done a really horrible job as president. He has done good things, two that I can think of. One, the AIDS relief you mentioned Sirithkaim and two, he has set up some natural preserves in the Ocean (or at least I think that eventually happened). I do not feel this outweighs how badly he’s let down this country.

    On the other hand, Obama, naturally will not be a perfect president, but I have high hopes that he’ll be a better one. Currently he’s obviously a media darling, but I think if he screws up over and over that will change, no matter how likable he is. If he generally does a good job though, doesn’t he deserve a little more forgiveness when he does make mistakes?

Comments are closed.